‹ ALL STRATEGIES
Test it yourself · our chart, our data Drift VWAP Pullback the “93% funded” strategy
Strategy byMatio KantiSQR Capital · interview
—
Tested and published by TradingBite Research·Updated 06 October 2026·How we test, and who we are·Tell us we got it wrong
—
30m range 5m candles
day 1 —
TRADING DAY OVER
—
—
The three conditions 4 trades left today
All three must hold
waiting for 10:30
Right now —
Signal
building the box
Let the first 30 minutes finish.
You vs the strategy nothing saved yet
You
trades you clicked
$0
0 taken · — won
The rules
every signal, taken automatically
$0
0 signals fired
A robot trades the rules alongside you and never skips a signal. That column is what the strategy itself made over the same sessions. Totals come from your saved journal, not this visit.
Your test 0 / 20
Trade 20 sessions and we will tell you what your test actually proves.
The strategy frozen rules
  1. Anchor the VWAP at 09:30, built from 15-minute bars.
  2. No trades before 10:30. The first hour just builds the line.
  3. LONG needs all three: price above VWAP, VWAP rising, price +0.10% on the hour. SHORT is the mirror.
  4. Trigger = the first candle coloured against the trade.
  5. Fill at the open of the next bar. Stop 80 pts, target 40 (long) / 50 (short).
  6. Max 4 trades a day, stop after 2 losses, flat at 15:55.
Risk / reward80 risked for 40
Breakeven needs66.7% win rate on longs, 61.5% on shorts
He claims64%
Entry window10:30 – 15:30
Flat by15:55
Limits4 trades, 2 losses, then stop
Your trades this session onward
Take a trade when the box breaks.
Where this comes from the claim, before the test
Source
What it claims
Win rate64% over 4,000+ trades
Funded odds93.6% within four attempts
Risk / rewardrisk 80 points to make 40
Average win / loss$866 / $1,300
Costs includednot stated in the interview

Everything above is taken from the source and frozen. The chart tests those exact words — nothing added, nothing softened.

Journal — your saved sessions 0 saved
Your test · complete

—

—

You against the strategy

How your trades ended

How far the trades actually got

What a different target would have paid

Same entries, same stop — only the target changed. A trade counts as a hit if its best point reached that level.

What this would pay

SETUP VOID —

The trade is off for today

— —

—

Something look wrong? Or want to ask about this test?

If a number here looks off, the chart misbehaves, or you think the rules were coded wrong — say so. Pages on this site have shipped with real mistakes and been corrected. The links below fill in what you were looking at, so the report is actually fixable.

REPORT A PROBLEM ASK ABOUT THIS STRATEGY “YOU CODED THE RULES WRONG”

How this was produced

The rules come from the teacher's own public video or write-up — or, for a textbook method or our own research, the page says so. They are coded as stated and run over years of futures data from a commercial market-data vendor, with commission charged on every trade; slippage is not modelled. Where a teacher gives no number, every value in the plausible range is tested and all of them are shown — not only the best one. Each page states the market, the period, the sample and the costs used.

Written with software. The tests are code, and the code and much of the writing were produced with AI assistance. Every result comes from that research code. The words around the numbers are written from those results — if you find one that disagrees with its own numbers, tell us and it gets fixed.

If a number here is wrong, say so. Email hello@tradingbite.net with the page and what you think is wrong. If a teacher believes their rules were read incorrectly, tell us how they should be read and we will re-run the test and publish the result, whichever way it goes.

This is not advice. These are tests of publicly taught methods on historical data, published so you can check them yourself. Past results do not predict future results. Trading futures can lose you more than you put in. Terms and full disclaimer ›