Trading Rush: “54 out of 100”. He found the next day up 54 times in 100 and called the pattern profitable. On six years of gold daily bars it was up 49.3% of the time over 75 patterns — and any day above the 200 MA was up 52.7% of the time. The pattern did worse than an ordinary day.
| chart | which bars | how many | next bar up |
|---|---|---|---|
| daily | any bar above the 200 MA | 1,089 | 52.7% |
| daily | his test | 75 | 49.3% |
| daily | 4+ red before | 7 | 85.7% |
| daily | volume above average | 39 | 38.5% |
| daily | engulfs the wick too | 18 | 55.6% |
| 1-hour | any bar above the 200 MA | 22,146 | 50.5% |
| 1-hour | his test | 1827 | 50.4% |
| 1-hour | 4+ red before | 155 | 42.6% |
| 1-hour | volume above average | 609 | 52.1% |
| 1-hour | engulfs the wick too | 502 | 50.0% |
| 1-hour | all three | 22 | 36.4% |
The third video: against a random entry. on the daily chart his 2R version makes $661.71 a trade against $1,079.76 for a random entry with the same filter, stop and target, and makes a little money, but not clearly enough to tell; on the 1-hour chart his 2R version makes $61.61 a trade against −$22.16 for a random entry with the same filter, stop and target, and makes a little money, but not clearly enough to tell.
| chart | exit | trades | win | a trade | 95% range | random entry |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| daily | target 2R | 73 | 39.7% | $661.71 | −$1,148.33 to $2,556.47 | $1,079.76 |
| daily | target 3R | 67 | 32.8% | $955.90 | −$1,244.76 to $3,328.38 | $1,644.25 |
| daily | half 1R, half 2R | 73 | 39.7% | $481.23 | −$1,089.87 to $2,035.10 | $745.41 |
| 1-hour | target 2R | 1948 | 35.0% | $61.61 | −$34.33 to $164.59 | −$22.16 |
| 1-hour | target 3R | 1708 | 27.8% | $95.38 | −$37.82 to $227.05 | −$2.31 |
| 1-hour | half 1R, half 2R | 1948 | 35.4% | $41.18 | −$36.89 to $122.33 | −$39.48 |
David Jones: every exit, since he gives none. He gives no target and no length for the prior trend, so every combination is run: on the daily chart, 12 combinations, none of them clear of the noise either way; on the 1-hour chart, 12 combinations, 5 of them clearly losing.
| chart | prior trend | exit | trades | win | a trade | 95% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| daily | 3 bars | out after 1 bar | 148 | 45.3% | −$188.72 | −$714.83 to $298.99 |
| daily | 3 bars | out after 3 bars | 134 | 52.2% | −$274.48 | −$1,113.55 to $537.22 |
| daily | 3 bars | out after 5 bars | 119 | 43.7% | −$434.83 | −$1,597.91 to $696.11 |
| daily | 3 bars | target 1R | 109 | 48.6% | −$837.66 | −$2,086.81 to $354.33 |
| daily | 3 bars | target 2R | 86 | 37.2% | −$341.74 | −$2,269.91 to $1,567.47 |
| daily | 3 bars | target 3R | 74 | 28.4% | −$898.65 | −$3,145.16 to $1,374.40 |
| daily | 5 bars | out after 1 bar | 128 | 43.8% | −$118.83 | −$547.81 to $340.97 |
| daily | 5 bars | out after 3 bars | 116 | 55.2% | $131.29 | −$651.15 to $905.40 |
| daily | 5 bars | out after 5 bars | 106 | 44.3% | −$90.75 | −$1,132.71 to $979.30 |
| daily | 5 bars | target 1R | 93 | 49.5% | −$320.38 | −$1,567.40 to $916.30 |
| daily | 5 bars | target 2R | 76 | 40.8% | $700.39 | −$1,095.57 to $2,677.14 |
| daily | 5 bars | target 3R | 68 | 30.9% | $435.00 | −$1,742.09 to $2,810.02 |
| 1-hour | 3 bars | out after 1 bar | 3745 | 44.1% | −$37.44 | −$57.25 to −$17.49 |
| 1-hour | 3 bars | out after 3 bars | 3221 | 41.0% | −$42.08 | −$79.40 to −$4.93 |
| 1-hour | 3 bars | out after 5 bars | 2911 | 37.8% | −$15.57 | −$63.84 to $31.98 |
| 1-hour | 3 bars | target 1R | 2608 | 48.4% | −$60.90 | −$116.47 to −$4.62 |
| 1-hour | 3 bars | target 2R | 2082 | 32.7% | −$60.72 | −$142.25 to $24.87 |
| 1-hour | 3 bars | target 3R | 1825 | 25.4% | −$66.02 | −$165.69 to $36.29 |
| 1-hour | 5 bars | out after 1 bar | 3616 | 44.5% | −$39.42 | −$59.29 to −$18.75 |
| 1-hour | 5 bars | out after 3 bars | 3118 | 41.6% | −$36.62 | −$74.13 to −$0.04 |
| 1-hour | 5 bars | out after 5 bars | 2835 | 38.1% | −$10.40 | −$58.86 to $41.66 |
| 1-hour | 5 bars | target 1R | 2512 | 48.9% | −$49.81 | −$107.17 to $6.71 |
| 1-hour | 5 bars | target 2R | 2015 | 33.4% | −$59.18 | −$148.27 to $32.53 |
| 1-hour | 5 bars | target 3R | 1765 | 26.4% | −$15.39 | −$123.73 to $98.90 |
The same numbers, live. This follows the switches above.
Why the teachers are kept apart. Merging them would produce a fourth set of rules that nobody taught. Each gets its own switch and its own table.
Numbers they do not give are shown across their range, not picked: the length of David Jones's prior trend and his exit.
Daily bars are futures sessions, 18:00 to 17:00 New York, not calendar days — cutting at midnight would split every session in two.
It tests each teacher's stated rules on gold. It does not test the confluence the third video recommends alongside the pattern.
If you teach this pattern differently, say how and we will test it the same way and publish it.
Three teachers, one pattern. David Jones of Trading 212 calls it “a very simple but often quite effective” pattern; Trading Rush tested it 100 times and called it profitable; the third video sells an MT4 scanner for it. Each is tested as stated, on gold.
Read it in their own words first:
If a number here looks off, the chart misbehaves, or you think the rules were coded wrong — say so. Pages on this site have shipped with real mistakes and been corrected. The links below fill in what you were looking at, so the report is actually fixable.
The rules come from the teacher's own public video or write-up — or, for a textbook method or our own research, the page says so. They are coded as stated and run over years of futures data from a commercial market-data vendor, with commission charged on every trade; slippage is not modelled. Where a teacher gives no number, every value in the plausible range is tested and all of them are shown — not only the best one. Each page states the market, the period, the sample and the costs used.
Written with software. The tests are code, and the code and much of the writing were produced with AI assistance. Every result comes from that research code. The words around the numbers are written from those results — if you find one that disagrees with its own numbers, tell us and it gets fixed.
If a number here is wrong, say so. Email hello@tradingbite.net with the page and what you think is wrong. If a teacher believes their rules were read incorrectly, tell us how they should be read and we will re-run the test and publish the result, whichever way it goes.
This is not advice. These are tests of publicly taught methods on historical data, published so you can check them yourself. Past results do not predict future results. Trading futures can lose you more than you put in. Terms and full disclaimer ›