‹ ALL STRATEGIES
Test it yourself · our chart, our data The Engulfing Candle three teachers · gold
Strategy byDavid Jones, Trading Rush and one morethree YouTube tutorials
2020-02-06 to 2026-09-28 · gold · daily and 1-hour · each teacher's own rules
Tested and published by TradingBite Research·Updated 06 October 2026·How we test, and who we are·Tell us we got it wrong
—
the engulfing pair moving average —
— — —
Right now —
Signal
flat
Play the session and watch the lines cross.
This session
Your trading
your trades
0
win rate
—
total
$0.00
per trade
—
this pair, tested
—
—
Three teachers, one pattern. Pick a teacher and a timeframe. The chart boxes every engulfing pair as the replay reaches it and draws the moving average that teacher filters with.
Timeframe Whose rules
Gold only. David Jones's own worked example is the gold daily chart. Trading Rush names no market; the third video uses AUD/NZD, which this archive does not hold. So gold stands in for both, and it is not their chart.
The rules each teacher's, as stated
  1. The pattern. A candle whose body swallows the body of the candle before it, the other colour. Bullish: it opens at or below the red candle's close and closes above its open.
  2. David Jones — after a prior trend (“sliding for a few days at least”), in at the close, stop beyond the pattern: “if it takes out the high the pattern's over”. He gives no target.
  3. Trading Rush — bullish only, above the 200 MA, and he measures whether the next day goes up. His extras: 4+ red candles before, above-average volume, and the candle engulfing the wick too.
  4. The third video — only with the 100 MA trend, “enter on the very next bar”, stop “just above the highs”, target twice or three times the risk, or half off at 1:1 and half at 2:1.
Marketgold (COMEX), daily and 1-hour
Tested2020-02-06 to 2026-09-28
David Jones, daily116 trades · $131.29
Trading Rush, daily75 trades · $324.73
Third video, daily73 trades · $661.71
Third video, 1-hour1,948 trades · $61.61
What we found
Three people teach this pattern three slightly different ways, and each version is tested here exactly as its teacher states it, on six years of gold. None of the three makes money clear of the noise, on either timeframe.

Trading Rush: “54 out of 100”. He found the next day up 54 times in 100 and called the pattern profitable. On six years of gold daily bars it was up 49.3% of the time over 75 patterns — and any day above the 200 MA was up 52.7% of the time. The pattern did worse than an ordinary day.

chartwhich barshow manynext bar up
dailyany bar above the 200 MA1,08952.7%
dailyhis test7549.3%
daily4+ red before785.7%
dailyvolume above average3938.5%
dailyengulfs the wick too1855.6%
1-hourany bar above the 200 MA22,14650.5%
1-hourhis test182750.4%
1-hour4+ red before15542.6%
1-hourvolume above average60952.1%
1-hourengulfs the wick too50250.0%
1-hourall three2236.4%

The third video: against a random entry. on the daily chart his 2R version makes $661.71 a trade against $1,079.76 for a random entry with the same filter, stop and target, and makes a little money, but not clearly enough to tell; on the 1-hour chart his 2R version makes $61.61 a trade against −$22.16 for a random entry with the same filter, stop and target, and makes a little money, but not clearly enough to tell.

chartexittradeswina trade 95% rangerandom entry
dailytarget 2R7339.7%$661.71−$1,148.33 to $2,556.47$1,079.76
dailytarget 3R6732.8%$955.90−$1,244.76 to $3,328.38$1,644.25
dailyhalf 1R, half 2R7339.7%$481.23−$1,089.87 to $2,035.10$745.41
1-hourtarget 2R194835.0%$61.61−$34.33 to $164.59−$22.16
1-hourtarget 3R170827.8%$95.38−$37.82 to $227.05−$2.31
1-hourhalf 1R, half 2R194835.4%$41.18−$36.89 to $122.33−$39.48

David Jones: every exit, since he gives none. He gives no target and no length for the prior trend, so every combination is run: on the daily chart, 12 combinations, none of them clear of the noise either way; on the 1-hour chart, 12 combinations, 5 of them clearly losing.

chartprior trendexittradeswin a trade95% range
daily3 barsout after 1 bar14845.3%−$188.72−$714.83 to $298.99
daily3 barsout after 3 bars13452.2%−$274.48−$1,113.55 to $537.22
daily3 barsout after 5 bars11943.7%−$434.83−$1,597.91 to $696.11
daily3 barstarget 1R10948.6%−$837.66−$2,086.81 to $354.33
daily3 barstarget 2R8637.2%−$341.74−$2,269.91 to $1,567.47
daily3 barstarget 3R7428.4%−$898.65−$3,145.16 to $1,374.40
daily5 barsout after 1 bar12843.8%−$118.83−$547.81 to $340.97
daily5 barsout after 3 bars11655.2%$131.29−$651.15 to $905.40
daily5 barsout after 5 bars10644.3%−$90.75−$1,132.71 to $979.30
daily5 barstarget 1R9349.5%−$320.38−$1,567.40 to $916.30
daily5 barstarget 2R7640.8%$700.39−$1,095.57 to $2,677.14
daily5 barstarget 3R6830.9%$435.00−$1,742.09 to $2,810.02
1-hour3 barsout after 1 bar374544.1%−$37.44−$57.25 to −$17.49
1-hour3 barsout after 3 bars322141.0%−$42.08−$79.40 to −$4.93
1-hour3 barsout after 5 bars291137.8%−$15.57−$63.84 to $31.98
1-hour3 barstarget 1R260848.4%−$60.90−$116.47 to −$4.62
1-hour3 barstarget 2R208232.7%−$60.72−$142.25 to $24.87
1-hour3 barstarget 3R182525.4%−$66.02−$165.69 to $36.29
1-hour5 barsout after 1 bar361644.5%−$39.42−$59.29 to −$18.75
1-hour5 barsout after 3 bars311841.6%−$36.62−$74.13 to −$0.04
1-hour5 barsout after 5 bars283538.1%−$10.40−$58.86 to $41.66
1-hour5 barstarget 1R251248.9%−$49.81−$107.17 to $6.71
1-hour5 barstarget 2R201533.4%−$59.18−$148.27 to $32.53
1-hour5 barstarget 3R176526.4%−$15.39−$123.73 to $98.90

The same numbers, live. This follows the switches above.

Everything else worth saying

Why the teachers are kept apart. Merging them would produce a fourth set of rules that nobody taught. Each gets its own switch and its own table.

Numbers they do not give are shown across their range, not picked: the length of David Jones's prior trend and his exit.

Daily bars are futures sessions, 18:00 to 17:00 New York, not calendar days — cutting at midnight would split every session in two.

What this test does not do

It tests each teacher's stated rules on gold. It does not test the confluence the third video recommends alongside the pattern.

  • Not their markets, except David Jones's. Trading Rush names none and the third video trades AUD/NZD.
  • Fibonacci and support and resistance are left out. The third video suggests them as extras; choosing which level matters is judgement, and coding it would invent a rule.
  • Trading Rush's “skip it if the candle is too big” has no size given, so it is not applied.
  • The replay is a sample: 27 daily and 40 1-hour stretches, scored over the whole period. David Jones's replay exits after three bars; every exit is in his table.

If you teach this pattern differently, say how and we will test it the same way and publish it.

Where this comes from the claim, before the test
The patterna candle whose body engulfs the previous body, the other colour
David Jonesafter a prior trend; stop beyond the pattern; no target given
Trading Rushbullish, above the 200 MA; next day up 54 times in 100
Trading Rush's extras4+ red before, volume above average, engulfs the wick
Third videowith the 100 MA trend; next-bar entry; 2R or 3R target
Their chartsgold daily (Jones), forex pairs (the other two)
Costs includednot mentioned by any of them

Three teachers, one pattern. David Jones of Trading 212 calls it “a very simple but often quite effective” pattern; Trading Rush tested it 100 times and called it profitable; the third video sells an MT4 scanner for it. Each is tested as stated, on gold.

Read it in their own words first:

Journal — your saved trades 0 saved
— —

—

Something look wrong? Or want to ask about this test?

If a number here looks off, the chart misbehaves, or you think the rules were coded wrong — say so. Pages on this site have shipped with real mistakes and been corrected. The links below fill in what you were looking at, so the report is actually fixable.

REPORT A PROBLEM ASK ABOUT THIS STRATEGY “YOU CODED THE RULES WRONG”

How this was produced

The rules come from the teacher's own public video or write-up — or, for a textbook method or our own research, the page says so. They are coded as stated and run over years of futures data from a commercial market-data vendor, with commission charged on every trade; slippage is not modelled. Where a teacher gives no number, every value in the plausible range is tested and all of them are shown — not only the best one. Each page states the market, the period, the sample and the costs used.

Written with software. The tests are code, and the code and much of the writing were produced with AI assistance. Every result comes from that research code. The words around the numbers are written from those results — if you find one that disagrees with its own numbers, tell us and it gets fixed.

If a number here is wrong, say so. Email hello@tradingbite.net with the page and what you think is wrong. If a teacher believes their rules were read incorrectly, tell us how they should be read and we will re-run the test and publish the result, whichever way it goes.

This is not advice. These are tests of publicly taught methods on historical data, published so you can check them yourself. Past results do not predict future results. Trading futures can lose you more than you put in. Terms and full disclaimer ›