These are patterns, not days. Each replay is the window around one “little rzy”: the drop, the bounce, the line, the measurement and what happened next.
| daily bars | trades | win | a trade | 95% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| her model | 76 | 28.9% | −$12.46 | −$302.37 to $297.99 |
| a fixed distance instead of her measurement | 73 | 26.0% | −$89.66 | −$288.87 to $124.29 |
| every pattern, not just the first two | 100 | 27.0% | −$82.83 | −$312.27 to $159.87 |
| neither | 94 | 23.4% | −$114.48 | −$282.90 to $59.91 |
| 4-hour bars | trades | win | a trade | 95% range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| her model | 386 | 28.2% | −$16.46 | −$69.02 to $38.82 |
| a fixed distance instead of her measurement | 435 | 28.0% | $0.47 | −$37.99 to $38.98 |
| every pattern, not just the first two | 445 | 27.4% | −$8.62 | −$58.26 to $39.99 |
| neither | 503 | 26.4% | −$3.08 | −$37.42 to $32.42 |
The same table, live. This one follows the two switches above, and it is what the pickers on the chart drive.
Her measurement. The strategy is the measured distance, so this is the number that matters most. Swap it for a fixed distance and keep everything else identical: on the daily chart her measurement adds $77.20 a trade; on the 4-hour chart it costs $16.93 a trade.
“The first one or two work the best.” Compared with taking every pattern in a run, on the daily chart taking only the first one or two adds $70.37 a trade; on the 4-hour chart it costs $7.84 a trade.
Against a random entry. A random entry taking the same side and holding for the same time makes $38.88 on daily bars against her −$12.46, and $0.21 on 4-hour bars against her −$16.46. Her model is behind on daily and behind on 4-hour.
1,491 patterns, 386 trades. Her own rules throw most of them out: only the first 2 in a run, and never risking more than the measured move pays. That discipline is hers, and it is also why so few trades are left to judge.
What an earlier version of this page got wrong. It entered automatically when the pattern confirmed, and said she gives no Bollinger rule. She does: “close below the mid-range of the Bollinger … you'd enter.” It also put the stop above the older, higher of the two trendline swings, where she says “recent swing high” and “just slightly above”. Both are fixed, and every number here is from her rules.
Two timeframes, both published. Her examples are weekly and monthly charts across decades. Four years of futures data cannot test a monthly chart, so this uses daily and 4-hour bars, and says so rather than presenting either as the one she trades.
We tested her stated rules: the trendline, the lowest low, the vertical measurement, the projection, her Bollinger entry, her stop and her one-to-one floor. She says the pattern is clearer by eye, and on lower timeframes a sideways stretch may hide one she would see.
If you use a pair that is not in the grid, or a filter you think matters, say so and we will test it the same way and publish it.
Second place in the Robbins World Cup futures division - 206% final, 319% at its high. She is blunt that it is simple: “it's something I feel like elementary school students could do.” Chart Fanatics publish the same rules in writing, and the write-up and the interview agree.
Read it in their own words first: Measured Move Trend Strategy (Little RZY) - Marci Silfrain Playbook →
If a number here looks off, the chart misbehaves, or you think the rules were coded wrong — say so. Pages on this site have shipped with real mistakes and been corrected. The links below fill in what you were looking at, so the report is actually fixable.
The rules come from the teacher's own public video or write-up — or, for a textbook method or our own research, the page says so. They are coded as stated and run over years of futures data from a commercial market-data vendor, with commission charged on every trade; slippage is not modelled. Where a teacher gives no number, every value in the plausible range is tested and all of them are shown — not only the best one. Each page states the market, the period, the sample and the costs used.
Written with software. The tests are code, and the code and much of the writing were produced with AI assistance. Every result comes from that research code. The words around the numbers are written from those results — if you find one that disagrees with its own numbers, tell us and it gets fixed.
If a number here is wrong, say so. Email hello@tradingbite.net with the page and what you think is wrong. If a teacher believes their rules were read incorrectly, tell us how they should be read and we will re-run the test and publish the result, whichever way it goes.
This is not advice. These are tests of publicly taught methods on historical data, published so you can check them yourself. Past results do not predict future results. Trading futures can lose you more than you put in. Terms and full disclaimer ›