‹ ALL STRATEGIES
Test it yourself · our chart, our data Marci Silfrain 2nd, Robbins World Cup futures · 319% high
Strategy byMarci SilfrainChart Fanatics · Robbins World Cup, 2nd
2022-07-07 to 2026-09-28 · daily and 4-hour · 94 replayable patterns
Tested and published by TradingBite Research·Updated 06 October 2026·How we test, and who we are·Tell us we got it wrong
—
trendline the measurement the projection —
— — —
Right now —
Signal
flat
Play the session and watch the lines cross.
This session
Your trading
your trades
0
win rate
—
total
$0.00
per trade
—
this pair, tested
—
—
Her whole method is one drawing. Price drops, it bounces, you draw a trendline across the bounce, you find the lowest candle inside it, and you measure straight up to the line. That distance, projected down from the low, is the target. The chart draws exactly that and nothing else — because there is nothing else.
Timeframe Rules on
FIXED DISTANCE is the control that matters. It takes the identical trades and identical stops, but sets the target at the median measured distance across every pattern instead of this one's own measurement. Same ambition on average, none of her information. If the measurement means anything, her model has to beat it.

These are patterns, not days. Each replay is the window around one “little rzy”: the drop, the bounce, the line, the measurement and what happened next.

Her charts are monthly. Ours cannot be. Her worked examples are the 1929 crash, the dot-com top, 2008, 2020 and 2025 — monthly and weekly bars going back a century. We hold four years of Nasdaq futures. That tests the daily and the 4-hour version of the same pattern, which is the closest this data allows, and it is not the chart she showed. She does say it works on any timeframe.
The rules coded exactly as taught
  1. Wait for the drop, then the bounce. The pattern needs both. She will not draw anything until price has fallen and turned back up.
  2. Draw the trendline across the bounce — the lower highs in a downtrend, the higher lows in an uptrend.
  3. Find the extreme inside the structure — the candle with the lowest low, or the highest high going the other way. Sometimes it is the first candle, sometimes the last.
  4. Measure vertically from that extreme up to the trendline directly above it. That distance is the whole strategy.
  5. Project the same distance from the extreme, in the direction of the trend. That is the target.
  6. The stop goes above the trendline or the recent swing — and she wants a close beyond it, not a touch: “a lot of times it will come test it and then just bounce.”
  7. Never risk more than the target pays. Her only stated risk rule: the distance to the stop should be “less than or equal to the profit you would take”.
  8. The first two are the good ones. “The fourth one, the fifth one, the market's getting tired now and it's ready for a bounce.”
Bars5 minutes, regular hours
Tested2022-07-07 to 2026-09-28
Daily76 trades · −$12.46
4-hour386 trades · −$16.46
A random entry$0.21 on the same trades
Patterns found301 daily, 1,491 on 4-hour
What we found
On her own rules — her measurement, her entry on a close through the middle Bollinger band, her stop just above the recent swing — the daily chart makes −$12.46 a trade over 76 trades and loses a little, but not clearly enough to tell either way. The 4-hour chart makes −$16.46 over 386 trades and loses a little, but not clearly enough to tell either way.
daily barstradeswina trade 95% range
her model7628.9%−$12.46−$302.37 to $297.99
a fixed distance instead of her measurement7326.0%−$89.66−$288.87 to $124.29
every pattern, not just the first two10027.0%−$82.83−$312.27 to $159.87
neither9423.4%−$114.48−$282.90 to $59.91
4-hour barstradeswina trade 95% range
her model38628.2%−$16.46−$69.02 to $38.82
a fixed distance instead of her measurement43528.0%$0.47−$37.99 to $38.98
every pattern, not just the first two44527.4%−$8.62−$58.26 to $39.99
neither50326.4%−$3.08−$37.42 to $32.42

The same table, live. This one follows the two switches above, and it is what the pickers on the chart drive.

Her measurement. The strategy is the measured distance, so this is the number that matters most. Swap it for a fixed distance and keep everything else identical: on the daily chart her measurement adds $77.20 a trade; on the 4-hour chart it costs $16.93 a trade.

“The first one or two work the best.” Compared with taking every pattern in a run, on the daily chart taking only the first one or two adds $70.37 a trade; on the 4-hour chart it costs $7.84 a trade.

Against a random entry. A random entry taking the same side and holding for the same time makes $38.88 on daily bars against her −$12.46, and $0.21 on 4-hour bars against her −$16.46. Her model is behind on daily and behind on 4-hour.

1,491 patterns, 386 trades. Her own rules throw most of them out: only the first 2 in a run, and never risking more than the measured move pays. That discipline is hers, and it is also why so few trades are left to judge.

Everything else worth saying

What an earlier version of this page got wrong. It entered automatically when the pattern confirmed, and said she gives no Bollinger rule. She does: “close below the mid-range of the Bollinger … you'd enter.” It also put the stop above the older, higher of the two trendline swings, where she says “recent swing high” and “just slightly above”. Both are fixed, and every number here is from her rules.

Two timeframes, both published. Her examples are weekly and monthly charts across decades. Four years of futures data cannot test a monthly chart, so this uses daily and 4-hour bars, and says so rather than presenting either as the one she trades.

What this test does not do

We tested her stated rules: the trendline, the lowest low, the vertical measurement, the projection, her Bollinger entry, her stop and her one-to-one floor. She says the pattern is clearer by eye, and on lower timeframes a sideways stretch may hide one she would see.

  • Her timeframe is longer than this data. Her examples are weekly and monthly; this is daily and 4-hour.
  • How long the band close may take is not given. We allow ten bars after the pattern forms. Holding limits were checked and never bind.
  • She uses judgement about the wider picture — fundamentals, Fibonacci levels — which a mechanical test cannot include.
  • The replay is a sample. The chart ships 18 daily and 94 4-hour patterns, scored over the whole period.

If you use a pair that is not in the grid, or a filter you think matters, say so and we will test it the same way and publish it.

Where this comes from the claim, before the test
The patterna drop, a bounce, and a trendline across the bounce
The measurementvertically from the extreme candle up to the trendline
The targetthat same distance, projected from the extreme
The stopabove the trendline or the recent swing, on a close
Risk rulenever risk more than the target pays
Sequencethe first and second work; by the fourth or fifth it is tired
ContextBollinger bands as 'reality' - the middle band is normal price
Timeframeany, but she prefers longer ones
Costs includednot mentioned

Second place in the Robbins World Cup futures division - 206% final, 319% at its high. She is blunt that it is simple: “it's something I feel like elementary school students could do.” Chart Fanatics publish the same rules in writing, and the write-up and the interview agree.

Read it in their own words first: Measured Move Trend Strategy (Little RZY) - Marci Silfrain Playbook →

Journal — your saved trades 0 saved
— —

—

Something look wrong? Or want to ask about this test?

If a number here looks off, the chart misbehaves, or you think the rules were coded wrong — say so. Pages on this site have shipped with real mistakes and been corrected. The links below fill in what you were looking at, so the report is actually fixable.

REPORT A PROBLEM ASK ABOUT THIS STRATEGY “YOU CODED THE RULES WRONG”

How this was produced

The rules come from the teacher's own public video or write-up — or, for a textbook method or our own research, the page says so. They are coded as stated and run over years of futures data from a commercial market-data vendor, with commission charged on every trade; slippage is not modelled. Where a teacher gives no number, every value in the plausible range is tested and all of them are shown — not only the best one. Each page states the market, the period, the sample and the costs used.

Written with software. The tests are code, and the code and much of the writing were produced with AI assistance. Every result comes from that research code. The words around the numbers are written from those results — if you find one that disagrees with its own numbers, tell us and it gets fixed.

If a number here is wrong, say so. Email hello@tradingbite.net with the page and what you think is wrong. If a teacher believes their rules were read incorrectly, tell us how they should be read and we will re-run the test and publish the result, whichever way it goes.

This is not advice. These are tests of publicly taught methods on historical data, published so you can check them yourself. Past results do not predict future results. Trading futures can lose you more than you put in. Terms and full disclaimer ›