‹ ALL STRATEGIES
Test it yourself · our chart, our data The 9:30 Nasdaq Open five teachers · Nasdaq
Strategy byPat, PFK alpha and three morefive YouTube tutorials
2022-07-08 to 2026-09-25 · Nasdaq (MNQ) · 5-minute replay · each teacher's own rules
Tested and published by TradingBite Research·Updated 06 October 2026·How we test, and who we are·Tell us we got it wrong
—
that teacher's levels —
— — —
Right now —
Signal
flat
Play the session and watch the lines cross.
This session
Your trading
your trades
0
win rate
—
total
$0.00
per trade
—
this pair, tested
—
—
Five teachers, one open. Pick whose rules to replay. The chart draws only the levels that teacher uses, so the same morning reads differently for each.
Whose rules
Nasdaq only. All five show Nasdaq futures. Tested on the micro contract, MNQ: $2 a point, $3 a round trip in costs.
The rules each teacher's, as stated
  1. The 9:30 gap video — mark a level before 9:30 that price could not break. After 9:30 a candle breaks it; wait for the first fair value gap and buy its 50%. Stop beyond the gap candle and safely beyond the broken level. Once a candle closes past the high made before the pullback, stop to break-even. “At least up to that 1:4”, then let it run. The live day in the video keeps trading until 4pm.
  2. Pat — the 9:30–9:45 candle is the range. A 5-minute candle closes outside it; set a limit back at a level (the broken edge, the midline). Stop beyond the far side of the range. Take about 30% halfway, then break-even. The live trade shown was 1:2.
  3. The key-level video — previous-day, Asia (18:00–24:00) and London (03:00–07:00) highs and lows, dropping any already hit. 9:30 to 10:30 only. Price sweeps one, then a single candle engulfs back: in at its close, stop beyond the sweep, target the next level. If that does not pay 1:2, “reduce the stop loss to the body of the candle”; still under 1:2, no trade.
  4. PFK alpha — longs only above both VWAP and the 1-hour 20 EMA (shorts below both). Enter when the 5-minute 9 EMA crosses the 20 EMA that way. “$60 stop, $60 target”, 1:1.
  5. The 5-minute range video — the 9:30–9:35 candle's high and low. On the 1-minute, a candle must close outside and leave a fair value gap; enter as the third candle closes. Stop at the candle that broke out. Fixed 2:1.
MarketNasdaq futures (MNQ)
Tested2022-07-08 to 2026-09-25, 1,047 mornings
9:30 gap1,675 trades · $1.07
Pat895 trades · $7.80
Key levels81 trades · −$10.83
PFK alpha646 trades · −$4.11
5-min range896 trades · −$0.74
What we found
Five teachers, five sets of rules for the same 9:30 open, each tested exactly as stated on 1,047 Nasdaq mornings. None of the five makes money clear of the noise.

The same numbers, live. One row per teacher, each at the plain reading of their own rules.

The 9:30 gap video. The video's own model test showed a 36% win rate over 303 trades. Here, trading all day and letting winners run past 1:4, 23.3% won. As stated: 1,675 trades, 23.3% won, $1.07 a trade — makes a little money, but not clearly enough to tell. Across all 6 versions below, 1 clearly losing, and 6 of 6 beat the same trades taken on a coin-flip side. 30.3% of its trades got at least 1:2 its way before the original stop, 13.4% got 1:4. The video does not say how far back the pre-9:30 level is, or how the stop trails past 1:4; each is varied below. Past 1:4 the stop follows each closed 5-minute candle.

versiontradeswina trade 95% rangecoin-flip sidegot to 1:2 1:31:4
5-min, level from the hour before 9:30, run past 1:4, all day1,67523.3%$1.07−$4.59 to $6.89−$5.2830.3%20.5%13.4%
same, but out at exactly 1:41,69323.3%−$0.41−$5.54 to $5.15−$4.1830.1%20.2%13.2%
same, but only until 11:3067318.7%−$0.03−$10.19 to $10.35−$7.8234.5%23.5%15.3%
level from the 30 min before 9:301,70223.5%−$0.12−$5.70 to $6.07−$3.2229.1%19.7%12.6%
level from the 2 hours before 9:301,62723.3%$0.47−$5.26 to $6.39−$6.6131.1%20.8%13.5%
1-min chart4,85917.0%−$3.38−$5.66 to −$1.10−$7.4328.5%21.7%16.1%

Pat. Pat quotes a 76.2% win rate from live streams. Here, 54.5% of trades won or paid a partial. As stated: 895 trades, 54.5% won, $7.80 a trade — makes a little money, but not clearly enough to tell. Across all 8 versions below, none is clear of the noise either way, and 6 of 8 beat the same trades taken on a coin-flip side. 20.7% of its trades got at least 1:2 its way before the original stop, 3.7% got 1:4. Pat's target is “a recent level”, so 1:1 and 1:2 are both run; the EMA is an optional confirmation.

versiontradeswina trade 95% rangecoin-flip sidegot to 1:2 1:31:4
limit at the range edge, 1:2 target89554.5%$7.80−$5.46 to $20.88−$2.9420.7%8.0%3.7%
limit at the range edge, 1:2 target, 9/21 EMA agreeing69354.4%$10.08−$5.22 to $25.40−$2.0819.9%7.6%3.2%
limit at the range edge, 1:1 target89567.9%$4.62−$5.74 to $14.82−$1.3420.7%8.0%3.7%
limit at the range edge, 1:1 target, 9/21 EMA agreeing69368.0%$5.52−$6.13 to $17.47−$2.9019.9%7.6%3.2%
limit at the midline, 1:2 target53153.9%$2.78−$6.97 to $12.64−$1.6034.3%23.5%16.0%
limit at the midline, 1:2 target, 9/21 EMA agreeing39352.9%$0.33−$10.70 to $11.45$0.3833.3%20.9%14.8%
limit at the midline, 1:1 target53170.6%$0.15−$6.16 to $6.56−$3.1734.3%23.5%16.0%
limit at the midline, 1:1 target, 9/21 EMA agreeing39369.0%−$3.40−$11.04 to $4.21−$1.0933.3%20.9%14.8%

The key-level video. As stated: 81 trades, 24.7% won, −$10.83 a trade — loses a little, but not clearly enough to tell. Across all 5 versions below, none is clear of the noise either way, and 3 of 5 beat the same trades taken on a coin-flip side. 29.6% of its trades got at least 1:2 its way before the original stop, 9.9% got 1:4. The video does not say how soon the reversal candle must come; its other exit is a stop trailed behind each candle. The body stop is only used when the wick stop cannot pay 1:2.

versiontradeswina trade 95% rangecoin-flip sidegot to 1:2 1:31:4
reversal within 3 candles, stop to the body if needed for 1:28124.7%−$10.83−$48.26 to $31.68−$0.0129.6%17.3%9.9%
same, stop above the wick only7427.0%−$4.36−$45.78 to $39.87−$10.3931.1%18.9%10.8%
reversal within 1 candle3925.6%−$7.44−$61.66 to $52.01−$27.0033.3%15.4%7.7%
reversal within 6 candles10724.3%−$19.14−$51.13 to $13.87−$11.2028.0%15.9%8.4%
stop trailed behind each candle instead of a target8133.3%$4.80−$18.77 to $30.09−$0.0129.6%17.3%9.9%

PFK alpha. As stated: 646 trades, 49.1% won, −$4.11 a trade — loses a little, but not clearly enough to tell. Across all 6 versions below, 3 clearly losing, and 2 of 6 beat the same trades taken on a coin-flip side. 33.6% of its trades got at least 1:2 its way before the original stop, 19.5% got 1:4. “$60” on one micro contract is 30 points; 15 and 60 are run too, market and limit.

versiontradeswina trade 95% rangecoin-flip sidegot to 1:2 1:31:4
“$60” read as 30 points, market entry64649.1%−$4.11−$8.76 to $0.53−$2.9533.6%24.5%19.5%
“$60” read as 30 points, limit entry39843.2%−$11.14−$17.17 to −$5.41−$4.9130.7%22.9%18.6%
“$60” read as 15 points, market entry65747.3%−$4.60−$6.88 to −$2.13−$4.1731.1%23.1%18.1%
“$60” read as 15 points, limit entry42343.5%−$6.90−$9.60 to −$4.06−$6.0831.7%24.1%20.3%
“$60” read as 60 points, market entry59752.6%$3.16−$6.44 to $12.41−$2.9832.0%14.9%8.4%
“$60” read as 60 points, limit entry34554.2%$6.82−$5.87 to $19.24−$2.9433.6%18.6%10.4%

The 5-minute range video. As stated: 896 trades, 33.1% won, −$0.74 a trade — loses a little, but not clearly enough to tell. Across all 2 versions below, none is clear of the noise either way, and 1 of 2 beat the same trades taken on a coin-flip side. 31.9% of its trades got at least 1:2 its way before the original stop, 16.2% got 1:4.

versiontradeswina trade 95% rangecoin-flip sidegot to 1:2 1:31:4
with the retest entry89633.1%−$0.74−$8.90 to $7.55−$3.4431.9%22.5%16.2%
without the retest entry39029.7%−$7.44−$18.14 to $3.56−$2.8029.0%22.3%16.7%
Everything else worth saying

Why the teachers are kept apart. Merging them would produce a sixth set of rules that nobody taught.

Numbers they do not give are shown across their range, not picked. The replay uses the first row of each table.

Coin-flip side takes the same entry, time, stop distance and target with the direction chosen at random. A real edge should beat it.

Three things the videos cannot settle, set the neutral way: a limit order fills when price touches it; if one minute touches both the stop and the target, the stop is counted; anything still open at 15:59 is closed there.

What this test does not do

It tests each teacher's stated rules. Anything that needs their judgement on the day is left out rather than guessed.

  • Higher-timeframe targets in the 9:30 gap video: past 1:4 the stop trails behind each 5-minute candle instead. The hand-drawn level is read as the high and low before the open, and later trades in the day reuse it.
  • Pat's “recent level” target and daily bias; Pat says the bias was not used on the live trade.
  • Swing and V-shape levels in the key-level video.
  • PFK alpha's round-number levels, which the video calls abstract.
  • The replay is a sample: 38 mornings, scored over the whole period.

If you teach the open differently, say how and we will test it the same way and publish it.

Where this comes from the claim, before the test
The ideatrade the first hour or two after the 9:30 New York open
The 9:30 gap videoown model test: 36% win rate over 303 trades, 1:4 target
Pat76.2% win rate on live streams, 15-minute opening range
The key-level videosweep of an old high or low, then an engulfing candle
PFK alpha9/20 EMA cross with VWAP and 1-hour bias, $60 stop and target
The 5-minute range videobreak of the first 5-minute candle with a gap, 2:1
Their marketNasdaq futures, all five
Costs includednot mentioned by any of them

Five teachers, one open, five different rule sets. Each is tested as that teacher states it, on Nasdaq, and kept apart.

Read it in their own words first:

Journal — your saved trades 0 saved
— —

—

Something look wrong? Or want to ask about this test?

If a number here looks off, the chart misbehaves, or you think the rules were coded wrong — say so. Pages on this site have shipped with real mistakes and been corrected. The links below fill in what you were looking at, so the report is actually fixable.

REPORT A PROBLEM ASK ABOUT THIS STRATEGY “YOU CODED THE RULES WRONG”

How this was produced

The rules come from the teacher's own public video or write-up — or, for a textbook method or our own research, the page says so. They are coded as stated and run over years of futures data from a commercial market-data vendor, with commission charged on every trade; slippage is not modelled. Where a teacher gives no number, every value in the plausible range is tested and all of them are shown — not only the best one. Each page states the market, the period, the sample and the costs used.

Written with software. The tests are code, and the code and much of the writing were produced with AI assistance. Every result comes from that research code. The words around the numbers are written from those results — if you find one that disagrees with its own numbers, tell us and it gets fixed.

If a number here is wrong, say so. Email hello@tradingbite.net with the page and what you think is wrong. If a teacher believes their rules were read incorrectly, tell us how they should be read and we will re-run the test and publish the result, whichever way it goes.

This is not advice. These are tests of publicly taught methods on historical data, published so you can check them yourself. Past results do not predict future results. Trading futures can lose you more than you put in. Terms and full disclaimer ›