‹ ALL STRATEGIES
Test it yourself · our chart, our data RSI Overbought & Oversold buy under 30, sell over 70
Strategy byTradingBiteour test of the second rule everyone learns
95 settings · 1,047 Nasdaq and 1,663 gold sessions · 5-minute bars
Tested and published by TradingBite Research·Updated 06 October 2026·How we test, and who we are·Tell us we got it wrong
—
RSI oversold / overbought signals
— —
Right now —
Signal
flat
Play the session and watch the lines cross.
This session
Your trading
your trades
0
win rate
—
total
$0.00
per trade
—
this pair, tested
—
—
Set the numbers you were taught. The RSI is worked out on the chart as you change them, so the line and the signals move with you.
Period Oversold Enter Trade
The default is RSI 14, 30/70, on touch — the numbers nearly every course teaches. On touch buys the bar that closes below the line; on reclaim waits for it to close back above.
Which market?   RSI is taught as a universal tool — the same two numbers for any market, any timeframe — so both are here to test that claim. Gold also keeps the test honest: a rule that holds a long for a while on a market that rose for four years collects the drift whether the signal means anything or not.
The rules coded exactly as taught
  1. Take Wilder's RSI of the close over a chosen period.
  2. When RSI closes below the oversold line (or, in the other version, back above it), buy at that bar's close — either the bar that closes below it, or the bar that closes back above, whichever version you were taught.
  3. Close the trade when RSI reaches the overbought line — and, if you are trading both sides, the mirror image for shorts.
  4. Flat at the end of the session. One position at a time.
  5. Our choices, not anyone's rule — nobody owns this strategy, so these had to be picked: flat at the end of the session; 5-minute bars; New York hours (9:30–16:00) for gold too; a setting needs at least 60 trades to be scored. The RSI runs on one continuous chart, as on a trading screen — it does not restart each morning.
  6. Costs are real: $3.00 a round turn on Nasdaq micros, $25.00 on gold.
  7. RSI at any bar uses closes up to and including that bar. Nothing looks ahead.
Bars5 minutes, regular hours
Settings tested95 across two markets
Best on NasdaqRSI 14 25/75 reclaim long · $26.00
Best on goldRSI 14 25/75 touch long · $40.67
Settings that made money21 of 47 · 3 of 47
Verdictrejected — no better than a random entry
What we found
The best setting out of 47 on Nasdaq makes $26.00 a trade. Entering at a random bar and holding for the same length of time makes $5.08. That gap is $20.93, at p=0.11 — indistinguishable from luck. The famous 30/70 on RSI 14 loses. And the setting with the highest win rate we found wins 61.2% of the time and still makes −$0.59 a trade.
tradeswina trade random, held as longthe rule is worth
Nasdaq · the famous RSI 14 30/70 49351.5%−$0.87$6.27 —
Nasdaq · the highest win rate we found 3,60461.2%−$0.59 ——
Nasdaq · best of 47 (RSI 14 25/75 reclaim long) 359—$26.00 $5.08$20.93
Gold · best of 48 (RSI 14 25/75 touch long) 460—$40.67 −$45.52$86.20

The famous numbers lose money. RSI 14 with 30/70, long only, is −$0.87 a trade over 493 trades. Those are the defaults on every platform and the numbers nearly every course teaches.

A high win rate is not an edge. The best win rate we found is 61.2% — right almost two times in three — and it still makes −$0.59 a trade over 3,604 trades. Waiting for an oversold reading gets you into a lot of small winners and a few large losers, because nothing stops the fall while you wait for RSI to climb back.

Every setting, not the one that suits us. The table below changes with the market and the side rule you have selected. 21 of 47 made money on Nasdaq; 3 of 48 did on gold — and not one of them clears the bar once you count how many settings were searched.

No pattern that holds on both markets. Looser lines are right a little more often, but the money does not follow them in a straight line, and waiting for the reclaim instead of buying the touch helps on Nasdaq and hurts on gold.

Everything else worth saying

The control is the whole test. Any rule that holds a long for a while on a market that rose for four years will make money without doing anything clever. So each setting is measured against entering at a random bar and holding for the same number of bars, with the same costs and the same side rule. If the oversold reading cannot beat that, it is measuring the market, not the signal.

The bar is set for the whole search, not each cell. Trying 95 settings and keeping the best is how noise gets published, so the threshold is divided by the number of settings tried. Nothing here comes close to it either way.

Costs weigh most on the settings that fire most. At $3.00 a round turn on Nasdaq and $25.00 on gold, a rule has to be right by more than the commission before it is worth anything.

What this test does not do

We tested RSI as it is taught — oversold, buy; overbought, out. That is the rule beginners are given.

  • No filter, no context. Most people who use this add something: only trade with the higher-timeframe trend, only in certain hours, only with a stop. Any of those could change the result, and none of them are part of the rule as taught.
  • No stop or target. The trade runs until RSI reaches the opposite line or the session ends, which is how the rule is usually described. That is also its weakness: nothing stops the fall while you wait.
  • Intraday, five-minute bars. Daily RSI is the other common version. Four years of sessions gives too few daily signals to score, so it is not covered here.
  • No divergence. Plenty of traders use RSI for divergence rather than for the 30 and 70 lines. That is a different rule and is not tested here.
  • Two markets. More would make the result stronger.
  • The replay is a sample. Every number is scored over all 1,047 Nasdaq and 1,663 gold sessions; the chart ships the most recent 1047 of each so the page stays light.

If you use a pair that is not in the grid, or a filter you think matters, say so and we will test it the same way and publish it.

Where this comes from the claim, before the test
The indicatorWilder's RSI, on every platform by default
The rulebuy under 30, sell over 70
The exitthe opposite line
Why it is taughtit needs no extra data and looks obvious in hindsight
Costs includedalmost never mentioned

Nobody owns this one. It is on every platform by default and in every beginner course, which is exactly why it was worth checking.

Journal — your saved trades 0 saved
— —

—

Something look wrong? Or want to ask about this test?

If a number here looks off, the chart misbehaves, or you think the rules were coded wrong — say so. Pages on this site have shipped with real mistakes and been corrected. The links below fill in what you were looking at, so the report is actually fixable.

REPORT A PROBLEM ASK ABOUT THIS STRATEGY “YOU CODED THE RULES WRONG”

How this was produced

The rules come from the teacher's own public video or write-up — or, for a textbook method or our own research, the page says so. They are coded as stated and run over years of futures data from a commercial market-data vendor, with commission charged on every trade; slippage is not modelled. Where a teacher gives no number, every value in the plausible range is tested and all of them are shown — not only the best one. Each page states the market, the period, the sample and the costs used.

Written with software. The tests are code, and the code and much of the writing were produced with AI assistance. Every result comes from that research code. The words around the numbers are written from those results — if you find one that disagrees with its own numbers, tell us and it gets fixed.

If a number here is wrong, say so. Email hello@tradingbite.net with the page and what you think is wrong. If a teacher believes their rules were read incorrectly, tell us how they should be read and we will re-run the test and publish the result, whichever way it goes.

This is not advice. These are tests of publicly taught methods on historical data, published so you can check them yourself. Past results do not predict future results. Trading futures can lose you more than you put in. Terms and full disclaimer ›