Tested and published by TradingBite Research·Updated 06 October 2026·How we test, and who we are·Tell us we got it wrong
‹ ALL STRATEGIES
Strategy Lab

Every order flow claim we have tested

Order flow software is sold on the idea that you can see what big money is doing. These are the specific claims - delta divergence, absorption, footprint levels, liquidity sweeps - each turned into rules and tested, including one that passed.

4 tested · 3 failed · 1 unproven

H4 200-Lot Footprint First Retest (Gold)

our own research · GC

The strongest candidate we have. Still one test short of approval.

156 trades · 48.1% win · PF 1.51
TEST IT — $29

Order Flow — Is the Delta Feed Worth Paying For?

TradingBite · MNQ

The free, price-only version loses less. Every time.

7,521 trades · 31.9% win
TEST IT ON OUR CHART ›

Fabio Valentini's Model — Do the Node and the Big Print Do Anything?

Fabio Valentini · MNQ

On his own management both models still lose.

883 trades · 7.6% win
TEST IT ON OUR CHART ›

Marco Accettone's Liquidity Model — Does the Strict Rule Do Anything?

Marco Accettone · MNQ

On his own stop it loses, clear of the noise, and loses to simply holding.

506 trades · 13.8% win
TEST IT ON OUR CHART ›
Other subjects we have tested
Every ICT strategy we have testedEvery gold strategy we have tested Every result in one table

How this was produced

The rules come from the teacher's own public video or write-up — or, for a textbook method or our own research, the page says so. They are coded as stated and run over years of futures data from a commercial market-data vendor, with commission charged on every trade; slippage is not modelled. Where a teacher gives no number, every value in the plausible range is tested and all of them are shown — not only the best one. Each page states the market, the period, the sample and the costs used.

Written with software. The tests are code, and the code and much of the writing were produced with AI assistance. Every result comes from that research code. The words around the numbers are written from those results — if you find one that disagrees with its own numbers, tell us and it gets fixed.

If a number here is wrong, say so. Email hello@tradingbite.net with the page and what you think is wrong. If a teacher believes their rules were read incorrectly, tell us how they should be read and we will re-run the test and publish the result, whichever way it goes.

This is not advice. These are tests of publicly taught methods on historical data, published so you can check them yourself. Past results do not predict future results. Trading futures can lose you more than you put in. Terms and full disclaimer ›