H4 200-Lot Footprint First Retest (Gold)
our own research · GC
The strongest candidate we have. Still one test short of approval.
156 trades · 48.1% win · PF 1.51
TEST IT — $29
Most strategies are taught on the indices and assumed to carry over. Gold has its own sessions, its own spread and its own way of moving, so we test it separately. These ran on COMEX gold futures.
The strongest candidate we have. Still one test short of approval.
With every filter it beats a random level - on 33 trades, and still not an ordinary dip.
On Nasdaq it neither makes nor loses money clear of the noise. On gold it clearly loses.
Nothing here is clear of the noise either way, on either market.
Her model makes money at every setting we tried. Too few trades to call it proven.
On his rules gold makes money and his London window helps. Too few trades to call it proven.
None of the three versions makes money clear of the noise on gold.
Every level in a range looks like it works - so a random line has to be the test.
The free, price-only version loses less. Every time.
The rules come from the teacher's own public video or write-up — or, for a textbook method or our own research, the page says so. They are coded as stated and run over years of futures data from a commercial market-data vendor, with commission charged on every trade; slippage is not modelled. Where a teacher gives no number, every value in the plausible range is tested and all of them are shown — not only the best one. Each page states the market, the period, the sample and the costs used.
Written with software. The tests are code, and the code and much of the writing were produced with AI assistance. Every result comes from that research code. The words around the numbers are written from those results — if you find one that disagrees with its own numbers, tell us and it gets fixed.
If a number here is wrong, say so. Email hello@tradingbite.net with the page and what you think is wrong. If a teacher believes their rules were read incorrectly, tell us how they should be read and we will re-run the test and publish the result, whichever way it goes.
This is not advice. These are tests of publicly taught methods on historical data, published so you can check them yourself. Past results do not predict future results. Trading futures can lose you more than you put in. Terms and full disclaimer ›